2008 Beneteau Oceanis 37 vs 1983 Pearson 31 — Comparison

2008 Beneteau Oceanis 372008 Beneteau Oceanis 37
VS
1983 Pearson 311983 Pearson 31

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2008 Beneteau Oceanis 371983 Pearson 31
General
ManufacturerBeneteauPearson
Year2008–20121983–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceUSA
DesignerFinot-ConqWilliam Shaw
Dimensions
LOA11.35 m (37.2 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
LWL9.93 m (32.6 ft)7.77 m (25.5 ft)
Beam3.72 m (12.2 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,680 kg (14,727 lbs)4,309 kg (9,500 lbs)
Ballast2,000 kg (4,409 lbs)1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area59.0 m² (635 ft²)40.0 m² (431 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine29 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity100 L (26.4 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2008 Beneteau Oceanis 37
16.90
1983 Pearson 31
15.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2008 Beneteau Oceanis 37
29.94
1983 Pearson 31
42.10
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2008 Beneteau Oceanis 37
0.79
1983 Pearson 31
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2008 Beneteau Oceanis 37
16.63
1983 Pearson 31
21.43

Detailed Comparison

The 2008 Beneteau Oceanis 37 and 1983 Pearson 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2008 Beneteau Oceanis 37 is a 2000s design by Beneteau from France, while the 1983 Pearson 31 is a 1980s offering from Pearson from USA. The 2008 Beneteau Oceanis 37 was penned by Finot-Conq. The 1983 Pearson 31 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 2008 Beneteau Oceanis 37 measures 11.35m (37.2ft) overall with a beam of 3.72m, compared to the 1983 Pearson 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 2008 Beneteau Oceanis 37 is 1.90m longer than the 1983 Pearson 31. The 2008 Beneteau Oceanis 37 displaces approximately 55% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2008 Beneteau Oceanis 37 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.90 and 59.0 m² of sail area. The 1983 Pearson 31, with an SA/D of 15.35 and 40.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2008 Beneteau Oceanis 37 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2008 Beneteau Oceanis 37 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1983 Pearson 31 has a comfort ratio of 21.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 29.9% for the 2008 Beneteau Oceanis 37 and 42.1% for the 1983 Pearson 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2008 Beneteau Oceanis 37 provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 200L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The 1983 Pearson 31 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Pearson 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2008 Beneteau Oceanis 37 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2008 Beneteau Oceanis 37 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2008 Beneteau Oceanis 37 · 1983 Pearson 31