2008 Catalina 350 vs 1996 Najad 380 — Comparison

2008 Catalina 350
VS
1996 Najad 380

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2008 Catalina 3501996 Najad 380
General
ManufacturerCatalinaNajad
Year2008–20121996–2006
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSASweden
DesignerGerry DouglasJudel/Vrolijk
Dimensions
LOA10.67 m (35.0 ft)11.55 m (37.9 ft)
LWL9.45 m (31.0 ft)9.50 m (31.2 ft)
Beam3.65 m (12.0 ft)3.55 m (11.6 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.85 m (6.1 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,577 kg (14,500 lbs)7,500 kg (16,535 lbs)
Ballast2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)3,050 kg (6,724 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area55.3 m² (595 ft²)62.0 m² (667 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)150 L (39.6 gal)
Water Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)260 L (68.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2008 Catalina 350
16.01
1996 Najad 380
16.44
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2008 Catalina 350
37.94
1996 Najad 380
40.67
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2008 Catalina 350
0.78
1996 Najad 380
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2008 Catalina 350
18.69
1996 Najad 380
20.83

Detailed Comparison

The 2008 Catalina 350 and 1996 Najad 380 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2008 Catalina 350 is a 2000s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1996 Najad 380 is a 1990s offering from Najad from Sweden. The 2008 Catalina 350 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1996 Najad 380 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.

In terms of size, the 2008 Catalina 350 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.65m, compared to the 1996 Najad 380 at 11.55m (37.9ft) with a 3.55m beam. The 1996 Najad 380 is 0.88m longer than the 2008 Catalina 350. The 1996 Najad 380 displaces approximately 14% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2008 Catalina 350 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.01 and 55.3 m² of sail area. The 1996 Najad 380, with an SA/D of 16.44 and 62.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1996 Najad 380 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2008 Catalina 350 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1996 Najad 380 has a comfort ratio of 20.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 37.9% for the 2008 Catalina 350 and 40.7% for the 1996 Najad 380, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2008 Catalina 350 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 1996 Najad 380 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 260L water and 150L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1996 Najad 380 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1996 Najad 380 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2008 Catalina 350 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2008 Catalina 350 · 1996 Najad 380