2008 Najad 395 vs 1983 Irwin 32 — Comparison
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 2008 Najad 395 | 1983 Irwin 32 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Najad | Irwin |
| Year | 2008–2015 | 1983–1988 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Sweden | USA |
| Designer | Judel/Vrolijk | Ted Irwin |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 12.10 m (39.7 ft) | 9.75 m (32.0 ft) |
| LWL | 10.30 m (33.8 ft) | 8.08 m (26.5 ft) |
| Beam | 3.80 m (12.5 ft) | 3.20 m (10.5 ft) |
| Draft | 2.00 m (6.6 ft) | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 9,000 kg (19,842 lbs) | 4,990 kg (11,001 lbs) |
| Ballast | 3,500 kg (7,716 lbs) | 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 71.0 m² (764 ft²) | 41.0 m² (441 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 55 HP | 18 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 200 L (52.8 gal) | 68 L (18.0 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 350 L (92.5 gal) | 114 L (30.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 6 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 2008 Najad 395 and 1983 Irwin 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2008 Najad 395 is a 2000s design by Najad from Sweden, while the 1983 Irwin 32 is a 1980s offering from Irwin from USA. The 2008 Najad 395 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 1983 Irwin 32 was designed by Ted Irwin.
In terms of size, the 2008 Najad 395 measures 12.10m (39.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.80m, compared to the 1983 Irwin 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 2008 Najad 395 is 2.35m longer than the 1983 Irwin 32. The 2008 Najad 395 displaces approximately 80% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 2008 Najad 395 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.67 and 71.0 m² of sail area. The 1983 Irwin 32, with an SA/D of 14.27 and 41.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 2008 Najad 395 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 2008 Najad 395 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 1983 Irwin 32 has a comfort ratio of 22.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 38.9% for the 2008 Najad 395 and 40.9% for the 1983 Irwin 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 2008 Najad 395 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 350L of water capacity and 200L of fuel. The 1983 Irwin 32 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1983 Irwin 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2008 Najad 395 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 2008 Najad 395 · 1983 Irwin 32