2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 vs 1983 Irwin 32 — Comparison
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 | 1983 Irwin 32 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hallberg-Rassy | Irwin |
| Year | 2010–2017 | 1983–1988 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Sweden | USA |
| Designer | German Frers | Ted Irwin |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 12.08 m (39.6 ft) | 9.75 m (32.0 ft) |
| LWL | 10.40 m (34.1 ft) | 8.08 m (26.5 ft) |
| Beam | 3.82 m (12.5 ft) | 3.20 m (10.5 ft) |
| Draft | 1.95 m (6.4 ft) | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 9,200 kg (20,283 lbs) | 4,990 kg (11,001 lbs) |
| Ballast | 3,500 kg (7,716 lbs) | 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 73.0 m² (786 ft²) | 41.0 m² (441 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 55 HP | 18 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 200 L (52.8 gal) | 68 L (18.0 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 380 L (100.4 gal) | 114 L (30.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 6 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 and 1983 Irwin 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 is a modern design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 1983 Irwin 32 is a 1980s offering from Irwin from USA. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 was penned by German Frers. The 1983 Irwin 32 was designed by Ted Irwin.
In terms of size, the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 measures 12.08m (39.6ft) overall with a beam of 3.82m, compared to the 1983 Irwin 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 is 2.33m longer than the 1983 Irwin 32. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 displaces approximately 84% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.89 and 73.0 m² of sail area. The 1983 Irwin 32, with an SA/D of 14.27 and 41.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 1983 Irwin 32 has a comfort ratio of 22.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 38.0% for the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 and 40.9% for the 1983 Irwin 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 380L of water capacity and 200L of fuel. The 1983 Irwin 32 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1983 Irwin 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 · 1983 Irwin 32