Hunter 36 vs 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 — Comparison
Hunter 36
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Hunter 36 | 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hunter | Hallberg-Rassy |
| Year | 1996–2001 | 2010–2017 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | Sweden |
| Designer | Glenn Henderson | German Frers |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.82 m (35.5 ft) | 12.08 m (39.6 ft) |
| LWL | 9.45 m (31.0 ft) | 10.40 m (34.1 ft) |
| Beam | 3.56 m (11.7 ft) | 3.82 m (12.5 ft) |
| Draft | 1.83 m (6.0 ft) | 1.95 m (6.4 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 5,897 kg (13,001 lbs) | 9,200 kg (20,283 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,313 kg (5,099 lbs) | 3,500 kg (7,716 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 56.0 m² (603 ft²) | 73.0 m² (786 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 27 HP | 55 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 95 L (25.1 gal) | 200 L (52.8 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 170 L (44.9 gal) | 380 L (100.4 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 6 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Hunter 36 and 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 36 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 is a modern offering from Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden. The Hunter 36 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 was designed by German Frers.
In terms of size, the Hunter 36 measures 10.82m (35.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.56m, compared to the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 at 12.08m (39.6ft) with a 3.82m beam. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 is 1.26m longer than the Hunter 36. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 displaces approximately 56% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Hunter 36 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.43 and 56.0 m² of sail area. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40, with an SA/D of 16.89 and 73.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hunter 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Hunter 36 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 has a comfort ratio of 19.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 39.2% for the Hunter 36 and 38.0% for the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Hunter 36 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L of water capacity and 95L of fuel. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 380L water and 200L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Hunter 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Hunter 36 · 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40