2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 vs 1981 Nautor Swan 36 — Comparison

2010 Beneteau Oceanis 432010 Beneteau Oceanis 43
VS
1981 Nautor Swan 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2010 Beneteau Oceanis 431981 Nautor Swan 36
General
ManufacturerBeneteauNautor Swan
Year2010–20141981–1989
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceFinland
DesignerGroupe Finot-ConqSparkman & Stephens
Dimensions
LOA13.17 m (43.2 ft)10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL11.60 m (38.1 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
Beam4.17 m (13.7 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft2.10 m (6.9 ft)1.98 m (6.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,500 kg (20,944 lbs)6,350 kg (13,999 lbs)
Ballast3,000 kg (6,614 lbs)2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area80.0 m² (861 ft²)54.5 m² (587 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine54 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)100 L (26.4 gal)
Water Capacity300 L (79.3 gal)180 L (47.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths86
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43
18.12
1981 Nautor Swan 36
16.15
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43
31.58
1981 Nautor Swan 36
42.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43
0.79
1981 Nautor Swan 36
0.72
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43
14.95
1981 Nautor Swan 36
22.73

Detailed Comparison

The 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 and 1981 Nautor Swan 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 is a modern design by Beneteau from France, while the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 is a 1980s offering from Nautor Swan from Finland. The 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 was penned by Groupe Finot-Conq. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 was designed by Sparkman & Stephens.

In terms of size, the 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 measures 13.17m (43.2ft) overall with a beam of 4.17m, compared to the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 is 2.20m longer than the 1981 Nautor Swan 36. The 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 displaces approximately 50% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.12 and 80.0 m² of sail area. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36, with an SA/D of 16.15 and 54.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 15.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 has a comfort ratio of 22.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 31.6% for the 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 and 42.9% for the 1981 Nautor Swan 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 300L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L water and 100L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 · 1981 Nautor Swan 36