2010 Dehler 32 vs 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 — Comparison

2010 Dehler 32 2010 Dehler 32
VS
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 2010 Dehler 32 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
General
Manufacturer Dehler Pacific Seacraft
Year 2010–2017 1988–2007
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Germany USA
Designer Judel/Vrolijk William Crealock
Dimensions
LOA 9.90 m (32.5 ft) 9.45 m (31.0 ft)
LWL 8.95 m (29.4 ft) 7.62 m (25.0 ft)
Beam 3.16 m (10.4 ft) 3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft 1.95 m (6.4 ft) 1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,400 kg (9,700 lbs) 4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast 1,500 kg (3,307 lbs) 2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 53.0 m² (571 ft²) 40.5 m² (436 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Full
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 25 HP
Fuel Capacity 55 L (14.5 gal) 76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity 100 L (26.4 gal) 151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 5
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2010 Dehler 32
20.06
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
14.09
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2010 Dehler 32
34.09
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
43.63
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2010 Dehler 32
0.77
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
0.71
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2010 Dehler 32
17.12
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
26.02

Detailed Comparison

The 2010 Dehler 32 and 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2010 Dehler 32 is a modern design by Dehler from Germany, while the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is a 1980s offering from Pacific Seacraft from USA. The 2010 Dehler 32 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 was designed by William Crealock.

In terms of size, the 2010 Dehler 32 measures 9.90m (32.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.16m, compared to the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 2010 Dehler 32 is 0.45m longer than the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 displaces approximately 13% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2010 Dehler 32 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 20.06 and 53.0 m² of sail area. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31, with an SA/D of 14.09 and 40.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 2010 Dehler 32 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2010 Dehler 32 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 has a comfort ratio of 26.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.71. The ballast ratios are 34.1% for the 2010 Dehler 32 and 43.6% for the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2010 Dehler 32 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 100L of water capacity and 55L of fuel. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2010 Dehler 32 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS