Hanse 315 vs 1980 Contest 33 — Comparison

Hanse 315
VS
1980 Contest 331980 Contest 33

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHanse 3151980 Contest 33
General
ManufacturerHanseContest
Year2010–20161980–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyNetherlands
Designerjudel/vrolijk & coDick Zaal
Dimensions
LOA9.65 m (31.7 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL8.55 m (28.1 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.15 m (10.3 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft1.65 m (5.4 ft)1.60 m (5.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,200 kg (9,259 lbs)5,200 kg (11,464 lbs)
Ballast1,200 kg (2,646 lbs)2,100 kg (4,630 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area41.5 m² (447 ft²)44.0 m² (474 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassSteel
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP22 HP
Fuel Capacity85 L (22.5 gal)100 L (26.4 gal)
Water Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths46
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 315
16.20
1980 Contest 33
14.90
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 315
28.57
1980 Contest 33
40.38
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 315
0.78
1980 Contest 33
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 315
17.75
1980 Contest 33
22.02

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 315 and 1980 Contest 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 315 is a modern design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1980 Contest 33 is a 1980s offering from Contest from Netherlands. The Hanse 315 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1980 Contest 33 was designed by Dick Zaal.

In terms of size, the Hanse 315 measures 9.65m (31.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.15m, compared to the 1980 Contest 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1980 Contest 33 is 0.41m longer than the Hanse 315. The 1980 Contest 33 displaces approximately 24% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 315 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.20 and 41.5 m² of sail area. The 1980 Contest 33, with an SA/D of 14.90 and 44.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The Hanse 315 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 315 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1980 Contest 33 has a comfort ratio of 22.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 28.6% for the Hanse 315 and 40.4% for the 1980 Contest 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 315 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 120L of water capacity and 85L of fuel. The 1980 Contest 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 100L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1980 Contest 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 315 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1980 Contest 33 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hanse 315 · 1980 Contest 33