Hanse 315 vs 2000 Sabre 386 — Comparison
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Hanse 315 | 2000 Sabre 386 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hanse | Sabre |
| Year | 2010–2016 | 2000–2007 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Germany | USA |
| Designer | judel/vrolijk & co | Jim Taylor |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 9.65 m (31.7 ft) | 11.58 m (38.0 ft) |
| LWL | 8.55 m (28.1 ft) | 9.75 m (32.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.15 m (10.3 ft) | 3.56 m (11.7 ft) |
| Draft | 1.65 m (5.4 ft) | 1.75 m (5.7 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 4,200 kg (9,259 lbs) | 7,257 kg (15,999 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,200 kg (2,646 lbs) | 2,948 kg (6,499 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 41.5 m² (447 ft²) | 60.5 m² (651 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 15 HP | 35 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 85 L (22.5 gal) | 114 L (30.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 120 L (31.7 gal) | 189 L (49.9 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 4 | 7 |
| Cabins | 1 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Hanse 315 and 2000 Sabre 386 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 315 is a modern design by Hanse from Germany, while the 2000 Sabre 386 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The Hanse 315 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 2000 Sabre 386 was designed by Jim Taylor.
In terms of size, the Hanse 315 measures 9.65m (31.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.15m, compared to the 2000 Sabre 386 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.56m beam. The 2000 Sabre 386 is 1.93m longer than the Hanse 315. The 2000 Sabre 386 displaces approximately 73% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Hanse 315 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.20 and 41.5 m² of sail area. The 2000 Sabre 386, with an SA/D of 16.40 and 60.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2000 Sabre 386 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Hanse 315 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 2000 Sabre 386 has a comfort ratio of 19.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 28.6% for the Hanse 315 and 40.6% for the 2000 Sabre 386, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Hanse 315 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 120L of water capacity and 85L of fuel. The 2000 Sabre 386 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L water and 114L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 2000 Sabre 386 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2000 Sabre 386 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 2000 Sabre 386 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Hanse 315 · 2000 Sabre 386