2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 vs 2010 Elan 340 — Comparison

2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
VS
2010 Elan 3402010 Elan 340

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2010 X-Yachts Xc 352010 Elan 340
General
ManufacturerX-YachtsElan
Year2010–20162010–2014
TypeSloopSloop
CountryDenmarkSlovenia
DesignerNiels JeppesenRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA10.57 m (34.7 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
LWL9.20 m (30.2 ft)9.00 m (29.5 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.95 m (6.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)
Ballast2,100 kg (4,630 lbs)1,750 kg (3,858 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area52.0 m² (560 ft²)55.0 m² (592 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity70 L (18.5 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity140 L (37.0 gal)160 L (42.3 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
16.37
2010 Elan 340
17.31
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
36.21
2010 Elan 340
30.17
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
0.75
2010 Elan 340
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
19.28
2010 Elan 340
19.73

Detailed Comparison

The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 and 2010 Elan 340 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 is a modern design by X-Yachts from Denmark, while the 2010 Elan 340 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 was penned by Niels Jeppesen. The 2010 Elan 340 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 measures 10.57m (34.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 2010 Elan 340 at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 is 0.21m longer than the 2010 Elan 340.

Looking at performance, the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.37 and 52.0 m² of sail area. The 2010 Elan 340, with an SA/D of 17.31 and 55.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2010 Elan 340 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 2010 Elan 340 has a comfort ratio of 19.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 36.2% for the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 and 30.2% for the 2010 Elan 340, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 140L of water capacity and 70L of fuel. The 2010 Elan 340 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 160L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2010 Elan 340 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2010 Elan 340 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 · 2010 Elan 340