Hanse 415 vs 1983 Pearson 31 — Comparison

Hanse 415
VS
1983 Pearson 311983 Pearson 31

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHanse 4151983 Pearson 31
General
ManufacturerHansePearson
Year2011–20171983–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUSA
Designerjudel/vrolijk & coWilliam Shaw
Dimensions
LOA12.40 m (40.7 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
LWL10.90 m (35.8 ft)7.77 m (25.5 ft)
Beam3.96 m (13.0 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft2.10 m (6.9 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement8,500 kg (18,739 lbs)4,309 kg (9,500 lbs)
Ballast2,650 kg (5,842 lbs)1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area73.0 m² (786 ft²)40.0 m² (431 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity170 L (44.9 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity310 L (81.9 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths86
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 415
17.81
1983 Pearson 31
15.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 415
31.18
1983 Pearson 31
42.10
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 415
0.78
1983 Pearson 31
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 415
16.21
1983 Pearson 31
21.43

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 415 and 1983 Pearson 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 415 is a modern design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1983 Pearson 31 is a 1980s offering from Pearson from USA. The Hanse 415 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1983 Pearson 31 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the Hanse 415 measures 12.40m (40.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.96m, compared to the 1983 Pearson 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.10m beam. The Hanse 415 is 2.95m longer than the 1983 Pearson 31. The Hanse 415 displaces approximately 97% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 415 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.81 and 73.0 m² of sail area. The 1983 Pearson 31, with an SA/D of 15.35 and 40.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 415 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 415 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1983 Pearson 31 has a comfort ratio of 21.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 31.2% for the Hanse 415 and 42.1% for the 1983 Pearson 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 415 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 310L of water capacity and 170L of fuel. The 1983 Pearson 31 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Pearson 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 415 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hanse 415 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hanse 415 · 1983 Pearson 31