Bavaria Cruiser 36 vs Hanse 342 — Comparison

Bavaria Cruiser 36 Bavaria Cruiser 36
VS
Hanse 342 Hanse 342

Specifications Side by Side

Specification Bavaria Cruiser 36 Hanse 342
General
Manufacturer Bavaria Hanse
Year 2012–2018 2006–2010
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Germany Germany
Designer Farr Yacht Design judel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA 11.30 m (37.1 ft) 10.30 m (33.8 ft)
LWL 9.80 m (32.2 ft) 9.20 m (30.2 ft)
Beam 3.57 m (11.7 ft) 3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft 1.85 m (6.1 ft) 1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement 6,400 kg (14,110 lbs) 5,300 kg (11,684 lbs)
Ballast 2,000 kg (4,409 lbs) 1,650 kg (3,638 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 58.0 m² (624 ft²) 52.0 m² (560 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 21 HP 21 HP
Fuel Capacity 110 L (29.1 gal) 100 L (26.4 gal)
Water Capacity 210 L (55.5 gal) 180 L (47.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Bavaria Cruiser 36
17.10
Hanse 342
17.38
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Bavaria Cruiser 36
31.25
Hanse 342
31.13
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Bavaria Cruiser 36
0.77
Hanse 342
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Bavaria Cruiser 36
17.18
Hanse 342
17.57

Detailed Comparison

The Bavaria Cruiser 36 and Hanse 342 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Bavaria Cruiser 36 is a modern design by Bavaria from Germany, while the Hanse 342 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The Bavaria Cruiser 36 was penned by Farr Yacht Design. The Hanse 342 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the Bavaria Cruiser 36 measures 11.30m (37.1ft) overall with a beam of 3.57m, compared to the Hanse 342 at 10.30m (33.8ft) with a 3.40m beam. The Bavaria Cruiser 36 is 1.00m longer than the Hanse 342. The Bavaria Cruiser 36 displaces approximately 21% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Bavaria Cruiser 36 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.10 and 58.0 m² of sail area. The Hanse 342, with an SA/D of 17.38 and 52.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hanse 342 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Bavaria Cruiser 36 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The Hanse 342 has a comfort ratio of 17.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 31.3% for the Bavaria Cruiser 36 and 31.1% for the Hanse 342, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Bavaria Cruiser 36 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 210L of water capacity and 110L of fuel. The Hanse 342 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L water and 100L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hanse 342 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 342 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS