2012 Hallberg-Rassy 64 vs 1996 MacGregor 65 — Comparison

2012 Hallberg-Rassy 64 2012 Hallberg-Rassy 64
VS
1996 MacGregor 65 1996 MacGregor 65

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 2012 Hallberg-Rassy 64 1996 MacGregor 65
General
Manufacturer Hallberg-Rassy MacGregor
Year 2012–2020 1996–2010
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Sweden USA
Designer German Frers Roger MacGregor
Dimensions
LOA 19.50 m (64.0 ft) 19.81 m (65.0 ft)
LWL 16.80 m (55.1 ft) 16.15 m (53.0 ft)
Beam 5.30 m (17.4 ft) 5.18 m (17.0 ft)
Draft 2.70 m (8.9 ft) 1.22 m (4.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 30,000 kg (66,139 lbs) 15,876 kg (35,001 lbs)
Ballast 11,000 kg (24,251 lbs) 5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 165.0 m² (1,776 ft²) 120.0 m² (1,292 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Centerboard
Engine & Tanks
Engine 230 HP 75 HP
Fuel Capacity 900 L (237.8 gal) 380 L (100.4 gal)
Water Capacity 1300 L (343.4 gal) 760 L (200.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 8 8
Cabins 4 4

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2012 Hallberg-Rassy 64
17.35
1996 MacGregor 65
19.30
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2012 Hallberg-Rassy 64
36.67
1996 MacGregor 65
34.28
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2012 Hallberg-Rassy 64
0.68
1996 MacGregor 65
0.83
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2012 Hallberg-Rassy 64
16.11
1996 MacGregor 65
9.17

Detailed Comparison

The 2012 Hallberg-Rassy 64 and 1996 MacGregor 65 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2012 Hallberg-Rassy 64 is a modern design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 1996 MacGregor 65 is a 1990s offering from MacGregor from USA. The 2012 Hallberg-Rassy 64 was penned by German Frers. The 1996 MacGregor 65 was designed by Roger MacGregor.

In terms of size, the 2012 Hallberg-Rassy 64 measures 19.50m (64.0ft) overall with a beam of 5.30m, compared to the 1996 MacGregor 65 at 19.81m (65.0ft) with a 5.18m beam. The 1996 MacGregor 65 is 0.31m longer than the 2012 Hallberg-Rassy 64. The 2012 Hallberg-Rassy 64 displaces approximately 89% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2012 Hallberg-Rassy 64 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.35 and 165.0 m² of sail area. The 1996 MacGregor 65, with an SA/D of 19.30 and 120.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1996 MacGregor 65 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2012 Hallberg-Rassy 64 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.68). The 1996 MacGregor 65 has a comfort ratio of 9.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.83. The ballast ratios are 36.7% for the 2012 Hallberg-Rassy 64 and 34.3% for the 1996 MacGregor 65, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2012 Hallberg-Rassy 64 provides 8 berths in 4 cabins with 1300L of water capacity and 900L of fuel. The 1996 MacGregor 65 offers 8 berths in 4 cabins with 760L water and 380L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2012 Hallberg-Rassy 64 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1996 MacGregor 65 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS