2006 Jeanneau Yachts 64 vs 1996 MacGregor 65 — Comparison

2006 Jeanneau Yachts 64 2006 Jeanneau Yachts 64
VS
1996 MacGregor 65 1996 MacGregor 65

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 2006 Jeanneau Yachts 64 1996 MacGregor 65
General
Manufacturer Jeanneau MacGregor
Year 2006–2010 1996–2010
Type Sloop Sloop
Country France USA
Designer Philippe Briand Roger MacGregor
Dimensions
LOA 19.50 m (64.0 ft) 19.81 m (65.0 ft)
LWL 17.20 m (56.4 ft) 16.15 m (53.0 ft)
Beam 5.30 m (17.4 ft) 5.18 m (17.0 ft)
Draft 2.65 m (8.7 ft) 1.22 m (4.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 28,000 kg (61,729 lbs) 15,876 kg (35,001 lbs)
Ballast 9,800 kg (21,605 lbs) 5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 170.0 m² (1,830 ft²) 120.0 m² (1,292 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass/Carbon Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Centerboard
Engine & Tanks
Engine 160 HP 75 HP
Fuel Capacity 600 L (158.5 gal) 380 L (100.4 gal)
Water Capacity 900 L (237.8 gal) 760 L (200.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 8 8
Cabins 4 4

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2006 Jeanneau Yachts 64
18.72
1996 MacGregor 65
19.30
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2006 Jeanneau Yachts 64
35.00
1996 MacGregor 65
34.28
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2006 Jeanneau Yachts 64
0.70
1996 MacGregor 65
0.83
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2006 Jeanneau Yachts 64
14.57
1996 MacGregor 65
9.17

Detailed Comparison

The 2006 Jeanneau Yachts 64 and 1996 MacGregor 65 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2006 Jeanneau Yachts 64 is a 2000s design by Jeanneau from France, while the 1996 MacGregor 65 is a 1990s offering from MacGregor from USA. The 2006 Jeanneau Yachts 64 was penned by Philippe Briand. The 1996 MacGregor 65 was designed by Roger MacGregor.

In terms of size, the 2006 Jeanneau Yachts 64 measures 19.50m (64.0ft) overall with a beam of 5.30m, compared to the 1996 MacGregor 65 at 19.81m (65.0ft) with a 5.18m beam. The 1996 MacGregor 65 is 0.31m longer than the 2006 Jeanneau Yachts 64. The 2006 Jeanneau Yachts 64 displaces approximately 76% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2006 Jeanneau Yachts 64 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.72 and 170.0 m² of sail area. The 1996 MacGregor 65, with an SA/D of 19.30 and 120.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1996 MacGregor 65 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2006 Jeanneau Yachts 64 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 14.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.70). The 1996 MacGregor 65 has a comfort ratio of 9.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.83. The ballast ratios are 35.0% for the 2006 Jeanneau Yachts 64 and 34.3% for the 1996 MacGregor 65, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2006 Jeanneau Yachts 64 provides 8 berths in 4 cabins with 900L of water capacity and 600L of fuel. The 1996 MacGregor 65 offers 8 berths in 4 cabins with 760L water and 380L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2006 Jeanneau Yachts 64 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1996 MacGregor 65 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS