2010 Oyster 625 vs 2006 Jeanneau Yachts 64 — Comparison

2010 Oyster 625 2010 Oyster 625
VS
2006 Jeanneau Yachts 64 2006 Jeanneau Yachts 64

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 2010 Oyster 625 2006 Jeanneau Yachts 64
General
Manufacturer Oyster Jeanneau
Year 2010–2018 2006–2010
Type Sloop Sloop
Country United Kingdom France
Designer Rob Humphreys Philippe Briand
Dimensions
LOA 19.00 m (62.3 ft) 19.50 m (64.0 ft)
LWL 16.00 m (52.5 ft) 17.20 m (56.4 ft)
Beam 5.10 m (16.7 ft) 5.30 m (17.4 ft)
Draft 2.55 m (8.4 ft) 2.65 m (8.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement 28,000 kg (61,729 lbs) 28,000 kg (61,729 lbs)
Ballast 10,500 kg (23,149 lbs) 9,800 kg (21,605 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 155.0 m² (1,668 ft²) 170.0 m² (1,830 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass/Carbon
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 200 HP 160 HP
Fuel Capacity 700 L (184.9 gal) 600 L (158.5 gal)
Water Capacity 1100 L (290.6 gal) 900 L (237.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 8 8
Cabins 4 4

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2010 Oyster 625
17.07
2006 Jeanneau Yachts 64
18.72
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2010 Oyster 625
37.50
2006 Jeanneau Yachts 64
35.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2010 Oyster 625
0.67
2006 Jeanneau Yachts 64
0.70
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2010 Oyster 625
17.19
2006 Jeanneau Yachts 64
14.57

Detailed Comparison

The 2010 Oyster 625 and 2006 Jeanneau Yachts 64 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2010 Oyster 625 is a modern design by Oyster from United Kingdom, while the 2006 Jeanneau Yachts 64 is a 2000s offering from Jeanneau from France. The 2010 Oyster 625 was penned by Rob Humphreys. The 2006 Jeanneau Yachts 64 was designed by Philippe Briand.

In terms of size, the 2010 Oyster 625 measures 19.00m (62.3ft) overall with a beam of 5.10m, compared to the 2006 Jeanneau Yachts 64 at 19.50m (64.0ft) with a 5.30m beam. The 2006 Jeanneau Yachts 64 is 0.50m longer than the 2010 Oyster 625.

Looking at performance, the 2010 Oyster 625 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.07 and 155.0 m² of sail area. The 2006 Jeanneau Yachts 64, with an SA/D of 18.72 and 170.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2006 Jeanneau Yachts 64 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2010 Oyster 625 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.67). The 2006 Jeanneau Yachts 64 has a comfort ratio of 14.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.70. The ballast ratios are 37.5% for the 2010 Oyster 625 and 35.0% for the 2006 Jeanneau Yachts 64, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2010 Oyster 625 provides 8 berths in 4 cabins with 1100L of water capacity and 700L of fuel. The 2006 Jeanneau Yachts 64 offers 8 berths in 4 cabins with 900L water and 600L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2010 Oyster 625 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2006 Jeanneau Yachts 64 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS