2012 Hanse 385 vs 2010 Elan 340 — Comparison

2012 Hanse 385 2012 Hanse 385
VS
2010 Elan 340 2010 Elan 340

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 2012 Hanse 385 2010 Elan 340
General
Manufacturer Hanse Elan
Year 2012–2016 2010–2014
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Germany Slovenia
Designer Judel/Vrolijk Rob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA 11.40 m (37.4 ft) 10.36 m (34.0 ft)
LWL 10.15 m (33.3 ft) 9.00 m (29.5 ft)
Beam 3.88 m (12.7 ft) 3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft 2.00 m (6.6 ft) 1.95 m (6.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement 7,300 kg (16,094 lbs) 5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)
Ballast 2,200 kg (4,850 lbs) 1,750 kg (3,858 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 67.0 m² (721 ft²) 55.0 m² (592 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 30 HP 21 HP
Fuel Capacity 80 L (21.1 gal) 80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity 170 L (44.9 gal) 160 L (42.3 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 8 6
Cabins 3 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2012 Hanse 385
18.09
2010 Elan 340
17.31
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2012 Hanse 385
30.14
2010 Elan 340
30.17
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2012 Hanse 385
0.80
2010 Elan 340
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2012 Hanse 385
16.64
2010 Elan 340
19.73

Detailed Comparison

The 2012 Hanse 385 and 2010 Elan 340 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2012 Hanse 385 is a modern design by Hanse from Germany, while the 2010 Elan 340 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 2012 Hanse 385 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 2010 Elan 340 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 2012 Hanse 385 measures 11.40m (37.4ft) overall with a beam of 3.88m, compared to the 2010 Elan 340 at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 2012 Hanse 385 is 1.04m longer than the 2010 Elan 340. The 2012 Hanse 385 displaces approximately 26% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2012 Hanse 385 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.09 and 67.0 m² of sail area. The 2010 Elan 340, with an SA/D of 17.31 and 55.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2012 Hanse 385 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2012 Hanse 385 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 2010 Elan 340 has a comfort ratio of 19.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 30.1% for the 2012 Hanse 385 and 30.2% for the 2010 Elan 340, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2012 Hanse 385 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 170L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 2010 Elan 340 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 160L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2010 Elan 340 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2012 Hanse 385 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2012 Hanse 385 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS