2012 Hanse 385 vs 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 — Comparison

2012 Hanse 385
VS
2013 Beneteau Figaro 32013 Beneteau Figaro 3

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2012 Hanse 3852013 Beneteau Figaro 3
General
ManufacturerHanseBeneteau
Year2012–20162013
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyFrance
DesignerJudel/VrolijkVPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost
Dimensions
LOA11.40 m (37.4 ft)10.10 m (33.1 ft)
LWL10.15 m (33.3 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam3.88 m (12.7 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft2.00 m (6.6 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,300 kg (16,094 lbs)3,450 kg (7,606 lbs)
Ballast2,200 kg (4,850 lbs)1,500 kg (3,307 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area67.0 m² (721 ft²)65.0 m² (700 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine30 HP20 HP
Fuel Capacity80 L (21.1 gal)60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity170 L (44.9 gal)40 L (10.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths82
Cabins31

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2012 Hanse 385
18.09
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
28.93
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2012 Hanse 385
30.14
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
43.48
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2012 Hanse 385
0.80
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
0.90
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2012 Hanse 385
16.64
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
11.16

Detailed Comparison

The 2012 Hanse 385 and 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2012 Hanse 385 is a modern design by Hanse from Germany, while the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 is a modern offering from Beneteau from France. The 2012 Hanse 385 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 was designed by VPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost.

In terms of size, the 2012 Hanse 385 measures 11.40m (37.4ft) overall with a beam of 3.88m, compared to the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 at 10.10m (33.1ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 2012 Hanse 385 is 1.30m longer than the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3. The 2012 Hanse 385 displaces approximately 112% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2012 Hanse 385 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.09 and 67.0 m² of sail area. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, with an SA/D of 28.93 and 65.0 m² of canvas, offers generous sail power for spirited sailing. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2012 Hanse 385 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has a comfort ratio of 11.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.90. The ballast ratios are 30.1% for the 2012 Hanse 385 and 43.5% for the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2012 Hanse 385 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 170L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 offers 2 berths in 1 cabin with 40L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2012 Hanse 385 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2012 Hanse 385 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2012 Hanse 385 · 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3