2013 Elan 350 vs 1973 Ranger 33 — Comparison

2013 Elan 350
VS
1973 Ranger 331973 Ranger 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2013 Elan 3501973 Ranger 33
General
ManufacturerElanRanger
Year2013–20181973–1979
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySloveniaUSA
DesignerRob HumphreysGary Mull
Dimensions
LOA10.67 m (35.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL9.30 m (30.5 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.46 m (11.4 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft2.00 m (6.6 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,100 kg (13,448 lbs)4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)
Ballast1,850 kg (4,079 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area58.0 m² (624 ft²)43.0 m² (463 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity80 L (21.1 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity170 L (44.9 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2013 Elan 350
17.65
1973 Ranger 33
15.43
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2013 Elan 350
30.33
1973 Ranger 33
42.85
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2013 Elan 350
0.76
1973 Ranger 33
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2013 Elan 350
19.02
1973 Ranger 33
21.50

Detailed Comparison

The 2013 Elan 350 and 1973 Ranger 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2013 Elan 350 is a modern design by Elan from Slovenia, while the 1973 Ranger 33 is a 1970s offering from Ranger from USA. The 2013 Elan 350 was penned by Rob Humphreys. The 1973 Ranger 33 was designed by Gary Mull.

In terms of size, the 2013 Elan 350 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.46m, compared to the 1973 Ranger 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 2013 Elan 350 is 0.61m longer than the 1973 Ranger 33. The 2013 Elan 350 displaces approximately 28% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2013 Elan 350 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.65 and 58.0 m² of sail area. The 1973 Ranger 33, with an SA/D of 15.43 and 43.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2013 Elan 350 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2013 Elan 350 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1973 Ranger 33 has a comfort ratio of 21.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 30.3% for the 2013 Elan 350 and 42.9% for the 1973 Ranger 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2013 Elan 350 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 1973 Ranger 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1973 Ranger 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2013 Elan 350 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2013 Elan 350 · 1973 Ranger 33