2013 Elan 350 vs 1977 Cal 33 — Comparison

2013 Elan 350
VS
1977 Cal 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2013 Elan 3501977 Cal 33
General
ManufacturerElanCal
Year2013–20181977–1982
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySloveniaUSA
DesignerRob HumphreysBill Lapworth / C. Raymond Hunt
Dimensions
LOA10.67 m (35.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL9.30 m (30.5 ft)8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam3.46 m (11.4 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft2.00 m (6.6 ft)1.60 m (5.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,100 kg (13,448 lbs)5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)
Ballast1,850 kg (4,079 lbs)2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area58.0 m² (624 ft²)43.0 m² (463 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity80 L (21.1 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity170 L (44.9 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2013 Elan 350
17.65
1977 Cal 33
14.53
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2013 Elan 350
30.33
1977 Cal 33
41.74
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2013 Elan 350
0.76
1977 Cal 33
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2013 Elan 350
19.02
1977 Cal 33
22.63

Detailed Comparison

The 2013 Elan 350 and 1977 Cal 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2013 Elan 350 is a modern design by Elan from Slovenia, while the 1977 Cal 33 is a 1970s offering from Cal from USA. The 2013 Elan 350 was penned by Rob Humphreys. The 1977 Cal 33 was designed by Bill Lapworth / C. Raymond Hunt.

In terms of size, the 2013 Elan 350 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.46m, compared to the 1977 Cal 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 2013 Elan 350 is 0.61m longer than the 1977 Cal 33. The 2013 Elan 350 displaces approximately 17% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2013 Elan 350 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.65 and 58.0 m² of sail area. The 1977 Cal 33, with an SA/D of 14.53 and 43.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 2013 Elan 350 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2013 Elan 350 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1977 Cal 33 has a comfort ratio of 22.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 30.3% for the 2013 Elan 350 and 41.7% for the 1977 Cal 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2013 Elan 350 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 1977 Cal 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1977 Cal 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2013 Elan 350 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2013 Elan 350 · 1977 Cal 33