2015 Hanse 345 vs Hunter 36 — Comparison

2015 Hanse 345
VS
Hunter 36Hunter 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2015 Hanse 345Hunter 36
General
ManufacturerHanseHunter
Year2015–20191996–2001
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUSA
DesignerJudel/VrolijkGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA10.37 m (34.0 ft)10.82 m (35.5 ft)
LWL9.50 m (31.2 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam3.52 m (11.5 ft)3.56 m (11.7 ft)
Draft1.85 m (6.1 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)5,897 kg (13,001 lbs)
Ballast1,700 kg (3,748 lbs)2,313 kg (5,099 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area55.5 m² (597 ft²)56.0 m² (603 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP27 HP
Fuel Capacity75 L (19.8 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Water Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)170 L (44.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2015 Hanse 345
17.47
Hunter 36
17.43
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2015 Hanse 345
29.31
Hunter 36
39.22
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2015 Hanse 345
0.78
Hunter 36
0.79
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2015 Hanse 345
17.50
Hunter 36
17.17

Detailed Comparison

The 2015 Hanse 345 and Hunter 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2015 Hanse 345 is a modern design by Hanse from Germany, while the Hunter 36 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 2015 Hanse 345 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The Hunter 36 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 2015 Hanse 345 measures 10.37m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.52m, compared to the Hunter 36 at 10.82m (35.5ft) with a 3.56m beam. The Hunter 36 is 0.45m longer than the 2015 Hanse 345. The Hunter 36 displaces approximately 2% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2015 Hanse 345 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.47 and 55.5 m² of sail area. The Hunter 36, with an SA/D of 17.43 and 56.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2015 Hanse 345 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2015 Hanse 345 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The Hunter 36 has a comfort ratio of 17.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.79. The ballast ratios are 29.3% for the 2015 Hanse 345 and 39.2% for the Hunter 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2015 Hanse 345 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L of water capacity and 75L of fuel. The Hunter 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L water and 95L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2015 Hanse 345 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2015 Hanse 345 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2015 Hanse 345 · Hunter 36