Beneteau Oceanis Yacht 62 vs 1996 MacGregor 65 — Comparison

Beneteau Oceanis Yacht 62 Beneteau Oceanis Yacht 62
VS
1996 MacGregor 65 1996 MacGregor 65

Specifications Side by Side

Specification Beneteau Oceanis Yacht 62 1996 MacGregor 65
General
Manufacturer Beneteau MacGregor
Year 2017 1996–2010
Type Sloop Sloop
Country France USA
Designer Berret-Racoupeau Roger MacGregor
Dimensions
LOA 18.90 m (62.0 ft) 19.81 m (65.0 ft)
LWL 16.97 m (55.7 ft) 16.15 m (53.0 ft)
Beam 5.22 m (17.1 ft) 5.18 m (17.0 ft)
Draft 2.80 m (9.2 ft) 1.22 m (4.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 24,000 kg (52,911 lbs) 15,876 kg (35,001 lbs)
Ballast 7,800 kg (17,196 lbs) 5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 160.0 m² (1,722 ft²) 120.0 m² (1,292 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Centerboard
Engine & Tanks
Engine 150 HP 75 HP
Fuel Capacity 500 L (132.1 gal) 380 L (100.4 gal)
Water Capacity 800 L (211.3 gal) 760 L (200.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 10 8
Cabins 4 4

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Beneteau Oceanis Yacht 62
19.53
1996 MacGregor 65
19.30
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Beneteau Oceanis Yacht 62
32.50
1996 MacGregor 65
34.28
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Beneteau Oceanis Yacht 62
0.73
1996 MacGregor 65
0.83
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Beneteau Oceanis Yacht 62
13.25
1996 MacGregor 65
9.17

Detailed Comparison

The Beneteau Oceanis Yacht 62 and 1996 MacGregor 65 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Beneteau Oceanis Yacht 62 is a modern design by Beneteau from France, while the 1996 MacGregor 65 is a 1990s offering from MacGregor from USA. The Beneteau Oceanis Yacht 62 was penned by Berret-Racoupeau. The 1996 MacGregor 65 was designed by Roger MacGregor.

In terms of size, the Beneteau Oceanis Yacht 62 measures 18.90m (62.0ft) overall with a beam of 5.22m, compared to the 1996 MacGregor 65 at 19.81m (65.0ft) with a 5.18m beam. The 1996 MacGregor 65 is 0.91m longer than the Beneteau Oceanis Yacht 62. The Beneteau Oceanis Yacht 62 displaces approximately 51% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Beneteau Oceanis Yacht 62 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 19.53 and 160.0 m² of sail area. The 1996 MacGregor 65, with an SA/D of 19.30 and 120.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Beneteau Oceanis Yacht 62 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Beneteau Oceanis Yacht 62 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 13.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 1996 MacGregor 65 has a comfort ratio of 9.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.83. The ballast ratios are 32.5% for the Beneteau Oceanis Yacht 62 and 34.3% for the 1996 MacGregor 65, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Beneteau Oceanis Yacht 62 provides 10 berths in 4 cabins with 800L of water capacity and 500L of fuel. The 1996 MacGregor 65 offers 8 berths in 4 cabins with 760L water and 380L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Beneteau Oceanis Yacht 62 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Beneteau Oceanis Yacht 62 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Beneteau Oceanis Yacht 62 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS