2017 Hallberg-Rassy 48 Mk II vs 1996 Moody 45 — Comparison

2017 Hallberg-Rassy 48 Mk II 2017 Hallberg-Rassy 48 Mk II
VS
1996 Moody 45 1996 Moody 45

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 2017 Hallberg-Rassy 48 Mk II 1996 Moody 45
General
Manufacturer Hallberg-Rassy Moody
Year 2017 1996–2002
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Sweden UK
Designer German Frers Bill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA 14.99 m (49.2 ft) 13.72 m (45.0 ft)
LWL 13.00 m (42.7 ft) 11.50 m (37.7 ft)
Beam 4.40 m (14.4 ft) 4.22 m (13.8 ft)
Draft 2.20 m (7.2 ft) 1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement 15,000 kg (33,069 lbs) 12,500 kg (27,558 lbs)
Ballast 5,500 kg (12,125 lbs) 4,900 kg (10,803 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 103.0 m² (1,109 ft²) 85.0 m² (915 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 110 HP 55 HP
Fuel Capacity 400 L (105.7 gal) 250 L (66.0 gal)
Water Capacity 700 L (184.9 gal) 450 L (118.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 8
Cabins 3 3

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2017 Hallberg-Rassy 48 Mk II
17.20
1996 Moody 45
16.03
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2017 Hallberg-Rassy 48 Mk II
36.67
1996 Moody 45
39.20
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2017 Hallberg-Rassy 48 Mk II
0.71
1996 Moody 45
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2017 Hallberg-Rassy 48 Mk II
17.32
1996 Moody 45
19.06

Detailed Comparison

The 2017 Hallberg-Rassy 48 Mk II and 1996 Moody 45 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2017 Hallberg-Rassy 48 Mk II is a modern design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 1996 Moody 45 is a 1990s offering from Moody from UK. The 2017 Hallberg-Rassy 48 Mk II was penned by German Frers. The 1996 Moody 45 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the 2017 Hallberg-Rassy 48 Mk II measures 14.99m (49.2ft) overall with a beam of 4.40m, compared to the 1996 Moody 45 at 13.72m (45.0ft) with a 4.22m beam. The 2017 Hallberg-Rassy 48 Mk II is 1.27m longer than the 1996 Moody 45. The 2017 Hallberg-Rassy 48 Mk II displaces approximately 20% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2017 Hallberg-Rassy 48 Mk II has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.20 and 103.0 m² of sail area. The 1996 Moody 45, with an SA/D of 16.03 and 85.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2017 Hallberg-Rassy 48 Mk II has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2017 Hallberg-Rassy 48 Mk II offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The 1996 Moody 45 has a comfort ratio of 19.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 36.7% for the 2017 Hallberg-Rassy 48 Mk II and 39.2% for the 1996 Moody 45, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2017 Hallberg-Rassy 48 Mk II provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 700L of water capacity and 400L of fuel. The 1996 Moody 45 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 450L water and 250L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1996 Moody 45 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2017 Hallberg-Rassy 48 Mk II has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1996 Moody 45 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS