Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 vs 1981 Nautor Swan 36 — Comparison

Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389
VS
1981 Nautor Swan 36 1981 Nautor Swan 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 1981 Nautor Swan 36
General
Manufacturer Jeanneau Nautor Swan
Year 2019 1981–1989
Type Sloop Sloop
Country France Finland
Designer Marc Lombard Sparkman & Stephens
Dimensions
LOA 11.75 m (38.5 ft) 10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL 10.40 m (34.1 ft) 8.53 m (28.0 ft)
Beam 3.76 m (12.3 ft) 3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft 1.90 m (6.2 ft) 1.98 m (6.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 7,600 kg (16,755 lbs) 6,350 kg (13,999 lbs)
Ballast 2,300 kg (5,071 lbs) 2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 64.0 m² (689 ft²) 54.5 m² (587 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 29 HP 28 HP
Fuel Capacity 160 L (42.3 gal) 100 L (26.4 gal)
Water Capacity 280 L (74.0 gal) 180 L (47.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389
16.82
1981 Nautor Swan 36
16.15
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389
30.26
1981 Nautor Swan 36
42.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389
0.77
1981 Nautor Swan 36
0.72
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389
17.14
1981 Nautor Swan 36
22.73

Detailed Comparison

The Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 and 1981 Nautor Swan 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 is a modern design by Jeanneau from France, while the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 is a 1980s offering from Nautor Swan from Finland. The Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 was penned by Marc Lombard. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 was designed by Sparkman & Stephens.

In terms of size, the Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 measures 11.75m (38.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.76m, compared to the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 is 0.78m longer than the 1981 Nautor Swan 36. The Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 displaces approximately 20% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.82 and 64.0 m² of sail area. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36, with an SA/D of 16.15 and 54.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 has a comfort ratio of 22.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 30.3% for the Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 and 42.9% for the 1981 Nautor Swan 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 280L of water capacity and 160L of fuel. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L water and 100L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS