1981 Nautor Swan 36 vs 1984 Ericson 38 — Comparison

1981 Nautor Swan 36 1981 Nautor Swan 36
VS
1984 Ericson 38 1984 Ericson 38

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1981 Nautor Swan 36 1984 Ericson 38
General
Manufacturer Nautor Swan Ericson
Year 1981–1989 1984–1990
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Finland USA
Designer Sparkman & Stephens Bruce King / Ron Holland
Dimensions
LOA 10.97 m (36.0 ft) 11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL 8.53 m (28.0 ft) 9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam 3.35 m (11.0 ft) 3.66 m (12.0 ft)
Draft 1.98 m (6.5 ft) 1.98 m (6.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 6,350 kg (13,999 lbs) 7,484 kg (16,499 lbs)
Ballast 2,722 kg (6,001 lbs) 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 54.5 m² (587 ft²) 60.0 m² (646 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 28 HP 30 HP
Fuel Capacity 100 L (26.4 gal) 114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity 180 L (47.6 gal) 200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 7
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1981 Nautor Swan 36
16.15
1984 Ericson 38
15.93
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1981 Nautor Swan 36
42.87
1984 Ericson 38
42.42
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1981 Nautor Swan 36
0.72
1984 Ericson 38
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1981 Nautor Swan 36
22.73
1984 Ericson 38
20.06

Detailed Comparison

The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 and 1984 Ericson 38 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 is a 1980s design by Nautor Swan from Finland, while the 1984 Ericson 38 is a 1980s offering from Ericson from USA. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 was penned by Sparkman & Stephens. The 1984 Ericson 38 was designed by Bruce King / Ron Holland.

In terms of size, the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 1984 Ericson 38 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The 1984 Ericson 38 is 0.61m longer than the 1981 Nautor Swan 36. The 1984 Ericson 38 displaces approximately 18% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.15 and 54.5 m² of sail area. The 1984 Ericson 38, with an SA/D of 15.93 and 60.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The 1984 Ericson 38 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 42.9% for the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 and 42.4% for the 1984 Ericson 38, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The 1984 Ericson 38 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1984 Ericson 38 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS