Beneteau Oceanis 40.1 vs 1996 Najad 380 — Comparison
Beneteau Oceanis 40.1
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Beneteau Oceanis 40.1 | 1996 Najad 380 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Beneteau | Najad |
| Year | 2020 | 1996–2006 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | France | Sweden |
| Designer | Marc Lombard | Judel/Vrolijk |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 12.28 m (40.3 ft) | 11.55 m (37.9 ft) |
| LWL | 10.78 m (35.4 ft) | 9.50 m (31.2 ft) |
| Beam | 3.99 m (13.1 ft) | 3.55 m (11.6 ft) |
| Draft | 2.15 m (7.1 ft) | 1.85 m (6.1 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 8,500 kg (18,739 lbs) | 7,500 kg (16,535 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,600 kg (5,732 lbs) | 3,050 kg (6,724 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 70.2 m² (756 ft²) | 62.0 m² (667 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 40 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 200 L (52.8 gal) | 150 L (39.6 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 350 L (92.5 gal) | 260 L (68.7 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 8 | 6 |
| Cabins | 3 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Beneteau Oceanis 40.1 and 1996 Najad 380 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Beneteau Oceanis 40.1 is a modern design by Beneteau from France, while the 1996 Najad 380 is a 1990s offering from Najad from Sweden. The Beneteau Oceanis 40.1 was penned by Marc Lombard. The 1996 Najad 380 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.
In terms of size, the Beneteau Oceanis 40.1 measures 12.28m (40.3ft) overall with a beam of 3.99m, compared to the 1996 Najad 380 at 11.55m (37.9ft) with a 3.55m beam. The Beneteau Oceanis 40.1 is 0.73m longer than the 1996 Najad 380. The Beneteau Oceanis 40.1 displaces approximately 13% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Beneteau Oceanis 40.1 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.12 and 70.2 m² of sail area. The 1996 Najad 380, with an SA/D of 16.44 and 62.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Beneteau Oceanis 40.1 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Beneteau Oceanis 40.1 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1996 Najad 380 has a comfort ratio of 20.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 30.6% for the Beneteau Oceanis 40.1 and 40.7% for the 1996 Najad 380, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Beneteau Oceanis 40.1 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 350L of water capacity and 200L of fuel. The 1996 Najad 380 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 260L water and 150L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1996 Najad 380 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Beneteau Oceanis 40.1 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The Beneteau Oceanis 40.1 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Beneteau Oceanis 40.1 · 1996 Najad 380