1963 Cal 40 vs Dufour 32 Classic — Comparison

1963 Cal 401963 Cal 40
VS
Dufour 32 Classic

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1963 Cal 40Dufour 32 Classic
General
ManufacturerCalDufour
Year1963–19721995–2002
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAFrance
DesignerBill LapworthUmberto Felci
Dimensions
LOA12.19 m (40.0 ft)9.70 m (31.8 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)8.40 m (27.6 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.70 m (5.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,030 kg (15,498 lbs)4,500 kg (9,921 lbs)
Ballast2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)1,400 kg (3,086 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area61.3 m² (660 ft²)45.0 m² (484 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)150 L (39.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1963 Cal 40
16.97
Dufour 32 Classic
16.78
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1963 Cal 40
38.72
Dufour 32 Classic
31.11
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1963 Cal 40
0.70
Dufour 32 Classic
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1963 Cal 40
21.35
Dufour 32 Classic
19.01

Detailed Comparison

The 1963 Cal 40 and Dufour 32 Classic represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1963 Cal 40 is a classic design by Cal from USA, while the Dufour 32 Classic is a 1990s offering from Dufour from France. The 1963 Cal 40 was penned by Bill Lapworth. The Dufour 32 Classic was designed by Umberto Felci.

In terms of size, the 1963 Cal 40 measures 12.19m (40.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the Dufour 32 Classic at 9.70m (31.8ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1963 Cal 40 is 2.49m longer than the Dufour 32 Classic. The 1963 Cal 40 displaces approximately 56% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1963 Cal 40 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.97 and 61.3 m² of sail area. The Dufour 32 Classic, with an SA/D of 16.78 and 45.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1963 Cal 40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1963 Cal 40 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.70). The Dufour 32 Classic has a comfort ratio of 19.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 38.7% for the 1963 Cal 40 and 31.1% for the Dufour 32 Classic, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1963 Cal 40 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The Dufour 32 Classic offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1963 Cal 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1963 Cal 40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1963 Cal 40 · Dufour 32 Classic