1963 Cal 40 vs Hunter 306 — Comparison

1963 Cal 401963 Cal 40
VS
Hunter 306Hunter 306

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1963 Cal 40Hunter 306
General
ManufacturerCalHunter
Year1963–19721999–2004
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerBill LapworthGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA12.19 m (40.0 ft)9.25 m (30.3 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.65 m (5.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,030 kg (15,498 lbs)3,990 kg (8,796 lbs)
Ballast2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area61.3 m² (660 ft²)43.0 m² (463 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1963 Cal 40
16.97
Hunter 306
17.37
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1963 Cal 40
38.72
Hunter 306
39.80
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1963 Cal 40
0.70
Hunter 306
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1963 Cal 40
21.35
Hunter 306
19.11

Detailed Comparison

The 1963 Cal 40 and Hunter 306 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1963 Cal 40 is a classic design by Cal from USA, while the Hunter 306 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1963 Cal 40 was penned by Bill Lapworth. The Hunter 306 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 1963 Cal 40 measures 12.19m (40.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the Hunter 306 at 9.25m (30.3ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 1963 Cal 40 is 2.94m longer than the Hunter 306. The 1963 Cal 40 displaces approximately 76% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1963 Cal 40 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.97 and 61.3 m² of sail area. The Hunter 306, with an SA/D of 17.37 and 43.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 306 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1963 Cal 40 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.70). The Hunter 306 has a comfort ratio of 19.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 38.7% for the 1963 Cal 40 and 39.8% for the Hunter 306, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1963 Cal 40 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The Hunter 306 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1963 Cal 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 306 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1963 Cal 40 · Hunter 306