1990 Contest 40S vs Hunter 306 — Comparison

1990 Contest 40S1990 Contest 40S
VS
Hunter 306Hunter 306

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1990 Contest 40SHunter 306
General
ManufacturerContestHunter
Year1990–20001999–2004
TypeSloopSloop
CountryNetherlandsUSA
DesignerDick ZaalGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA12.25 m (40.2 ft)9.25 m (30.3 ft)
LWL10.06 m (33.0 ft)8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam3.72 m (12.2 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.90 m (6.2 ft)1.65 m (5.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,072 kg (20,000 lbs)3,990 kg (8,796 lbs)
Ballast3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area68.5 m² (737 ft²)43.0 m² (463 ft²)
Hull MaterialSteelFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity250 L (66.0 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity400 L (105.7 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1990 Contest 40S
16.00
Hunter 306
17.37
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1990 Contest 40S
40.00
Hunter 306
39.80
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1990 Contest 40S
0.71
Hunter 306
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1990 Contest 40S
21.09
Hunter 306
19.11

Detailed Comparison

The 1990 Contest 40S and Hunter 306 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1990 Contest 40S is a 1990s design by Contest from Netherlands, while the Hunter 306 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1990 Contest 40S was penned by Dick Zaal. The Hunter 306 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 1990 Contest 40S measures 12.25m (40.2ft) overall with a beam of 3.72m, compared to the Hunter 306 at 9.25m (30.3ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 1990 Contest 40S is 3.00m longer than the Hunter 306. The 1990 Contest 40S displaces approximately 127% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1990 Contest 40S has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.00 and 68.5 m² of sail area. The Hunter 306, with an SA/D of 17.37 and 43.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 306 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1990 Contest 40S offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The Hunter 306 has a comfort ratio of 19.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1990 Contest 40S and 39.8% for the Hunter 306, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1990 Contest 40S provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 400L of water capacity and 250L of fuel. The Hunter 306 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Contest 40S is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 306 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1990 Contest 40S · Hunter 306