1963 Cal 40 vs Catalina 425 — Comparison

1963 Cal 401963 Cal 40
VS
Catalina 425Catalina 425

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1963 Cal 40Catalina 425
General
ManufacturerCalCatalina
Year1963–19722013
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerBill LapworthGerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA12.19 m (40.0 ft)12.95 m (42.5 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)11.28 m (37.0 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)3.96 m (13.0 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)2.06 m (6.8 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,030 kg (15,498 lbs)9,616 kg (21,200 lbs)
Ballast2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)3,719 kg (8,199 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area61.3 m² (660 ft²)78.0 m² (840 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)152 L (40.2 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)322 L (85.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1963 Cal 40
16.97
Catalina 425
17.52
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1963 Cal 40
38.72
Catalina 425
38.68
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1963 Cal 40
0.70
Catalina 425
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1963 Cal 40
21.35
Catalina 425
17.02

Detailed Comparison

The 1963 Cal 40 and Catalina 425 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1963 Cal 40 is a classic design by Cal from USA, while the Catalina 425 is a modern offering from Catalina from USA. The 1963 Cal 40 was penned by Bill Lapworth. The Catalina 425 was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the 1963 Cal 40 measures 12.19m (40.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the Catalina 425 at 12.95m (42.5ft) with a 3.96m beam. The Catalina 425 is 0.76m longer than the 1963 Cal 40. The Catalina 425 displaces approximately 37% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1963 Cal 40 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.97 and 61.3 m² of sail area. The Catalina 425, with an SA/D of 17.52 and 78.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Catalina 425 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1963 Cal 40 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.70). The Catalina 425 has a comfort ratio of 17.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 38.7% for the 1963 Cal 40 and 38.7% for the Catalina 425, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1963 Cal 40 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The Catalina 425 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 322L water and 152L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1963 Cal 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 425 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Catalina 425 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1963 Cal 40 · Catalina 425