1965 Bristol 35.5 vs 1971 C&C 27 — Comparison

1965 Bristol 35.5 1965 Bristol 35.5
VS
1971 C&C 27 1971 C&C 27

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1965 Bristol 35.5 1971 C&C 27
General
Manufacturer Bristol C&C Yachts
Year 1965–1972 1971–1975
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA Canada
Designer Halsey Herreshoff Cuthbertson & Cassian
Dimensions
LOA 10.82 m (35.5 ft) 8.23 m (27.0 ft)
LWL 7.62 m (25.0 ft) 6.55 m (21.5 ft)
Beam 2.97 m (9.7 ft) 2.74 m (9.0 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 5,897 kg (13,001 lbs) 2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)
Ballast 2,449 kg (5,399 lbs) 1,043 kg (2,299 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 47.4 m² (510 ft²) 31.0 m² (334 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Full Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 10 HP
Fuel Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal) 38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 5
Cabins 2 1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1965 Bristol 35.5
14.75
1971 C&C 27
17.13
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1965 Bristol 35.5
41.53
1971 C&C 27
41.80
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1965 Bristol 35.5
0.66
1971 C&C 27
0.81
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1965 Bristol 35.5
28.88
1971 C&C 27
20.13

Detailed Comparison

The 1965 Bristol 35.5 and 1971 C&C 27 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1965 Bristol 35.5 is a classic design by Bristol from USA, while the 1971 C&C 27 is a 1970s offering from C&C Yachts from Canada. The 1965 Bristol 35.5 was penned by Halsey Herreshoff. The 1971 C&C 27 was designed by Cuthbertson & Cassian.

In terms of size, the 1965 Bristol 35.5 measures 10.82m (35.5ft) overall with a beam of 2.97m, compared to the 1971 C&C 27 at 8.23m (27.0ft) with a 2.74m beam. The 1965 Bristol 35.5 is 2.59m longer than the 1971 C&C 27. The 1965 Bristol 35.5 displaces approximately 136% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1965 Bristol 35.5 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.75 and 47.4 m² of sail area. The 1971 C&C 27, with an SA/D of 17.13 and 31.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1971 C&C 27 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1965 Bristol 35.5 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 28.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.66). The 1971 C&C 27 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.81. The ballast ratios are 41.5% for the 1965 Bristol 35.5 and 41.8% for the 1971 C&C 27, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1965 Bristol 35.5 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1971 C&C 27 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 38L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1965 Bristol 35.5 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1971 C&C 27 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1965 Bristol 35.5 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS