1965 Pearson Vanguard vs 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 — Comparison

1965 Pearson Vanguard 1965 Pearson Vanguard
VS
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1965 Pearson Vanguard 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
General
Manufacturer Pearson Pacific Seacraft
Year 1965–1972 1982–2005
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Philip Rhodes William Crealock
Dimensions
LOA 9.83 m (32.3 ft) 8.23 m (27.0 ft)
LWL 7.01 m (23.0 ft) 6.55 m (21.5 ft)
Beam 2.84 m (9.3 ft) 2.64 m (8.7 ft)
Draft 1.22 m (4.0 ft) 1.14 m (3.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,082 kg (8,999 lbs) 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Ballast 1,678 kg (3,699 lbs) 1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 36.0 m² (388 ft²) 30.5 m² (328 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Full Full
Engine & Tanks
Engine 10 HP 15 HP
Fuel Capacity 38 L (10.0 gal) 45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal) 76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 4
Cabins 1 1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1965 Pearson Vanguard
14.32
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
14.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1965 Pearson Vanguard
41.11
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
42.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1965 Pearson Vanguard
0.71
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
0.72
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1965 Pearson Vanguard
25.31
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
26.91

Detailed Comparison

The 1965 Pearson Vanguard and 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1965 Pearson Vanguard is a classic design by Pearson from USA, while the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 is a 1980s offering from Pacific Seacraft from USA. The 1965 Pearson Vanguard was penned by Philip Rhodes. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 was designed by William Crealock.

In terms of size, the 1965 Pearson Vanguard measures 9.83m (32.3ft) overall with a beam of 2.84m, compared to the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 at 8.23m (27.0ft) with a 2.64m beam. The 1965 Pearson Vanguard is 1.60m longer than the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27. The 1965 Pearson Vanguard displaces approximately 29% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1965 Pearson Vanguard has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.32 and 36.0 m² of sail area. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27, with an SA/D of 14.35 and 30.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1965 Pearson Vanguard offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 25.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 has a comfort ratio of 26.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 41.1% for the 1965 Pearson Vanguard and 42.9% for the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1965 Pearson Vanguard provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1965 Pearson Vanguard offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS