1966 Islander 33 vs Hanse 320 — Comparison

1966 Islander 331966 Islander 33
VS
Hanse 320Hanse 320

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1966 Islander 33Hanse 320
General
ManufacturerIslanderHanse
Year1966–19742005–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAGermany
DesignerJoseph McGlassonjudel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA10.06 m (33.0 ft)9.92 m (32.5 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)8.80 m (28.9 ft)
Beam2.97 m (9.7 ft)3.28 m (10.8 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.70 m (5.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)4,600 kg (10,141 lbs)
Ballast1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)1,400 kg (3,086 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area42.0 m² (452 ft²)46.0 m² (495 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)90 L (23.8 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)150 L (39.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1966 Islander 33
15.57
Hanse 320
16.90
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1966 Islander 33
39.99
Hanse 320
30.43
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1966 Islander 33
0.72
Hanse 320
0.79
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1966 Islander 33
23.44
Hanse 320
17.40

Detailed Comparison

The 1966 Islander 33 and Hanse 320 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1966 Islander 33 is a classic design by Islander from USA, while the Hanse 320 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1966 Islander 33 was penned by Joseph McGlasson. The Hanse 320 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1966 Islander 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.97m, compared to the Hanse 320 at 9.92m (32.5ft) with a 3.28m beam. The 1966 Islander 33 is 0.14m longer than the Hanse 320. The Hanse 320 displaces approximately 1% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1966 Islander 33 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.57 and 42.0 m² of sail area. The Hanse 320, with an SA/D of 16.90 and 46.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 320 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1966 Islander 33 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The Hanse 320 has a comfort ratio of 17.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.79. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1966 Islander 33 and 30.4% for the Hanse 320, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1966 Islander 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Hanse 320 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L water and 90L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1966 Islander 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 320 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1966 Islander 33 · Hanse 320