1967 Pearson 35 vs 1976 Ericson 29 — Comparison

1967 Pearson 35 1967 Pearson 35
VS
1976 Ericson 29 1976 Ericson 29

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1967 Pearson 35 1976 Ericson 29
General
Manufacturer Pearson Ericson
Year 1967–1973 1976–1983
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer William Shaw Bruce King
Dimensions
LOA 10.67 m (35.0 ft) 8.84 m (29.0 ft)
LWL 7.62 m (25.0 ft) 7.32 m (24.0 ft)
Beam 3.05 m (10.0 ft) 2.84 m (9.3 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 5,443 kg (12,000 lbs) 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Ballast 2,268 kg (5,000 lbs) 1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 48.6 m² (523 ft²) 34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Full Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 13 HP
Fuel Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal) 45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 5
Cabins 2 1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1967 Pearson 35
15.96
1976 Ericson 29
15.99
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1967 Pearson 35
41.67
1976 Ericson 29
42.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1967 Pearson 35
0.69
1976 Ericson 29
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1967 Pearson 35
26.00
1976 Ericson 29
20.09

Detailed Comparison

The 1967 Pearson 35 and 1976 Ericson 29 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1967 Pearson 35 is a classic design by Pearson from USA, while the 1976 Ericson 29 is a 1970s offering from Ericson from USA. The 1967 Pearson 35 was penned by William Shaw. The 1976 Ericson 29 was designed by Bruce King.

In terms of size, the 1967 Pearson 35 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 1976 Ericson 29 at 8.84m (29.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The 1967 Pearson 35 is 1.83m longer than the 1976 Ericson 29. The 1967 Pearson 35 displaces approximately 71% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1967 Pearson 35 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.96 and 48.6 m² of sail area. The 1976 Ericson 29, with an SA/D of 15.99 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1976 Ericson 29 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1967 Pearson 35 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 26.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.69). The 1976 Ericson 29 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 41.7% for the 1967 Pearson 35 and 42.9% for the 1976 Ericson 29, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1967 Pearson 35 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1976 Ericson 29 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1967 Pearson 35 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1976 Ericson 29 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1967 Pearson 35 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS