1967 Pearson 35 vs 2002 X-Yachts X-37 — Comparison

1967 Pearson 35
VS
2002 X-Yachts X-37

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1967 Pearson 352002 X-Yachts X-37
General
ManufacturerPearsonX-Yachts
Year1967–19732002–2008
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSADenmark
DesignerWilliam ShawNiels Jeppesen
Dimensions
LOA10.67 m (35.0 ft)11.15 m (36.6 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)3.42 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)2.15 m (7.1 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)6,500 kg (14,330 lbs)
Ballast2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)2,500 kg (5,512 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area48.6 m² (523 ft²)62.0 m² (667 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)150 L (39.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1967 Pearson 35
15.96
2002 X-Yachts X-37
18.09
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1967 Pearson 35
41.67
2002 X-Yachts X-37
38.46
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1967 Pearson 35
0.69
2002 X-Yachts X-37
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1967 Pearson 35
26.00
2002 X-Yachts X-37
18.77

Detailed Comparison

The 1967 Pearson 35 and 2002 X-Yachts X-37 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1967 Pearson 35 is a classic design by Pearson from USA, while the 2002 X-Yachts X-37 is a 2000s offering from X-Yachts from Denmark. The 1967 Pearson 35 was penned by William Shaw. The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 was designed by Niels Jeppesen.

In terms of size, the 1967 Pearson 35 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 2002 X-Yachts X-37 at 11.15m (36.6ft) with a 3.42m beam. The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 is 0.48m longer than the 1967 Pearson 35. The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 displaces approximately 19% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1967 Pearson 35 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.96 and 48.6 m² of sail area. The 2002 X-Yachts X-37, with an SA/D of 18.09 and 62.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1967 Pearson 35 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 26.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.69). The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 has a comfort ratio of 18.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 41.7% for the 1967 Pearson 35 and 38.5% for the 2002 X-Yachts X-37, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1967 Pearson 35 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1967 Pearson 35 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1967 Pearson 35 · 2002 X-Yachts X-37