1967 Pearson 35 vs 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 — Comparison

1967 Pearson 35
VS
2012 X-Yachts Xc 42

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1967 Pearson 352012 X-Yachts Xc 42
General
ManufacturerPearsonX-Yachts
Year1967–19732012–2018
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSADenmark
DesignerWilliam ShawNiels Jeppesen
Dimensions
LOA10.67 m (35.0 ft)12.73 m (41.8 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)10.90 m (35.8 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)3.93 m (12.9 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)9,800 kg (21,605 lbs)
Ballast2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)3,600 kg (7,937 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area48.6 m² (523 ft²)79.0 m² (850 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)150 L (39.6 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)300 L (79.3 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1967 Pearson 35
15.96
2012 X-Yachts Xc 42
17.52
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1967 Pearson 35
41.67
2012 X-Yachts Xc 42
36.73
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1967 Pearson 35
0.69
2012 X-Yachts Xc 42
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1967 Pearson 35
26.00
2012 X-Yachts Xc 42
18.55

Detailed Comparison

The 1967 Pearson 35 and 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1967 Pearson 35 is a classic design by Pearson from USA, while the 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 is a modern offering from X-Yachts from Denmark. The 1967 Pearson 35 was penned by William Shaw. The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 was designed by Niels Jeppesen.

In terms of size, the 1967 Pearson 35 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 at 12.73m (41.8ft) with a 3.93m beam. The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 is 2.06m longer than the 1967 Pearson 35. The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 displaces approximately 80% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1967 Pearson 35 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.96 and 48.6 m² of sail area. The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42, with an SA/D of 17.52 and 79.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1967 Pearson 35 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 26.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.69). The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 has a comfort ratio of 18.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 41.7% for the 1967 Pearson 35 and 36.7% for the 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1967 Pearson 35 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 300L water and 150L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1967 Pearson 35 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1967 Pearson 35 · 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42