1967 Pearson 35 vs 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 — Comparison

1967 Pearson 35
VS
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 402010 Hallberg-Rassy 40

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1967 Pearson 352010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
General
ManufacturerPearsonHallberg-Rassy
Year1967–19732010–2017
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSASweden
DesignerWilliam ShawGerman Frers
Dimensions
LOA10.67 m (35.0 ft)12.08 m (39.6 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)10.40 m (34.1 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)3.82 m (12.5 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.95 m (6.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)9,200 kg (20,283 lbs)
Ballast2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)3,500 kg (7,716 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area48.6 m² (523 ft²)73.0 m² (786 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)380 L (100.4 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1967 Pearson 35
15.96
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
16.89
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1967 Pearson 35
41.67
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
38.04
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1967 Pearson 35
0.69
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1967 Pearson 35
26.00
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
19.94

Detailed Comparison

The 1967 Pearson 35 and 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1967 Pearson 35 is a classic design by Pearson from USA, while the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 is a modern offering from Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden. The 1967 Pearson 35 was penned by William Shaw. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 was designed by German Frers.

In terms of size, the 1967 Pearson 35 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 at 12.08m (39.6ft) with a 3.82m beam. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 is 1.41m longer than the 1967 Pearson 35. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 displaces approximately 69% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1967 Pearson 35 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.96 and 48.6 m² of sail area. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40, with an SA/D of 16.89 and 73.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1967 Pearson 35 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 26.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.69). The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 has a comfort ratio of 19.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 41.7% for the 1967 Pearson 35 and 38.0% for the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1967 Pearson 35 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 380L water and 200L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1967 Pearson 35 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1967 Pearson 35 · 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40