1967 Pearson 35 vs Catalina 445 — Comparison
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1967 Pearson 35 | Catalina 445 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Pearson | Catalina |
| Year | 1967–1973 | 2016 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | William Shaw | Gerry Douglas |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.67 m (35.0 ft) | 13.56 m (44.5 ft) |
| LWL | 7.62 m (25.0 ft) | 11.89 m (39.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.05 m (10.0 ft) | 4.17 m (13.7 ft) |
| Draft | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) | 2.06 m (6.8 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 5,443 kg (12,000 lbs) | 11,340 kg (25,000 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,268 kg (5,000 lbs) | 4,309 kg (9,500 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 48.6 m² (523 ft²) | 84.0 m² (904 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Full | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 18 HP | 55 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 57 L (15.1 gal) | 189 L (49.9 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 114 L (30.1 gal) | 379 L (100.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 7 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1967 Pearson 35 and Catalina 445 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1967 Pearson 35 is a classic design by Pearson from USA, while the Catalina 445 is a modern offering from Catalina from USA. The 1967 Pearson 35 was penned by William Shaw. The Catalina 445 was designed by Gerry Douglas.
In terms of size, the 1967 Pearson 35 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the Catalina 445 at 13.56m (44.5ft) with a 4.17m beam. The Catalina 445 is 2.89m longer than the 1967 Pearson 35. The Catalina 445 displaces approximately 108% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1967 Pearson 35 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.96 and 48.6 m² of sail area. The Catalina 445, with an SA/D of 16.91 and 84.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Catalina 445 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1967 Pearson 35 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 26.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.69). The Catalina 445 has a comfort ratio of 16.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 41.7% for the 1967 Pearson 35 and 38.0% for the Catalina 445, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1967 Pearson 35 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Catalina 445 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 379L water and 189L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1967 Pearson 35 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Catalina 445 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The Catalina 445 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1967 Pearson 35 · Catalina 445