1969 Cal 34 vs Catalina 270 — Comparison

1969 Cal 341969 Cal 34
VS
Catalina 270Catalina 270

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1969 Cal 34Catalina 270
General
ManufacturerCalCatalina
Year1969–19751992–2002
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerBill LapworthGerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA10.36 m (34.0 ft)8.31 m (27.3 ft)
LWL8.08 m (26.5 ft)7.24 m (23.8 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)2.74 m (9.0 ft)
Draft1.65 m (5.4 ft)1.47 m (4.8 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)2,313 kg (5,099 lbs)
Ballast2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)907 kg (2,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area47.4 m² (510 ft²)31.0 m² (334 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP12 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1969 Cal 34
16.01
Catalina 270
18.01
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1969 Cal 34
39.13
Catalina 270
39.21
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1969 Cal 34
0.70
Catalina 270
0.83
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1969 Cal 34
23.63
Catalina 270
16.24

Detailed Comparison

The 1969 Cal 34 and Catalina 270 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1969 Cal 34 is a classic design by Cal from USA, while the Catalina 270 is a 1990s offering from Catalina from USA. The 1969 Cal 34 was penned by Bill Lapworth. The Catalina 270 was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the 1969 Cal 34 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the Catalina 270 at 8.31m (27.3ft) with a 2.74m beam. The 1969 Cal 34 is 2.05m longer than the Catalina 270. The 1969 Cal 34 displaces approximately 126% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1969 Cal 34 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.01 and 47.4 m² of sail area. The Catalina 270, with an SA/D of 18.01 and 31.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Catalina 270 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1969 Cal 34 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.70). The Catalina 270 has a comfort ratio of 16.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.83. The ballast ratios are 39.1% for the 1969 Cal 34 and 39.2% for the Catalina 270, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1969 Cal 34 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Catalina 270 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 68L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1969 Cal 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 270 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1969 Cal 34 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1969 Cal 34 · Catalina 270