1970 Bristol 32 vs 1975 Pearson 28 — Comparison

1970 Bristol 321970 Bristol 32
VS
1975 Pearson 281975 Pearson 28

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1970 Bristol 321975 Pearson 28
General
ManufacturerBristolPearson
Year1970–19771975–1982
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerHalsey HerreshoffWilliam Shaw
Dimensions
LOA9.75 m (32.0 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
LWL7.16 m (23.5 ft)7.01 m (23.0 ft)
Beam2.97 m (9.7 ft)2.74 m (9.0 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)
Ballast1,905 kg (4,200 lbs)1,270 kg (2,800 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area40.2 m² (433 ft²)30.0 m² (323 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP10 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths55
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1970 Bristol 32
14.91
1975 Pearson 28
14.83
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1970 Bristol 32
42.00
1975 Pearson 28
43.08
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1970 Bristol 32
0.72
1975 Pearson 28
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1970 Bristol 32
25.96
1975 Pearson 28
21.23

Detailed Comparison

The 1970 Bristol 32 and 1975 Pearson 28 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1970 Bristol 32 is a 1970s design by Bristol from USA, while the 1975 Pearson 28 is a 1970s offering from Pearson from USA. The 1970 Bristol 32 was penned by Halsey Herreshoff. The 1975 Pearson 28 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 1970 Bristol 32 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.97m, compared to the 1975 Pearson 28 at 8.53m (28.0ft) with a 2.74m beam. The 1970 Bristol 32 is 1.22m longer than the 1975 Pearson 28. The 1970 Bristol 32 displaces approximately 54% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1970 Bristol 32 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.91 and 40.2 m² of sail area. The 1975 Pearson 28, with an SA/D of 14.83 and 30.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1970 Bristol 32 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1970 Bristol 32 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 26.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The 1975 Pearson 28 has a comfort ratio of 21.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 42.0% for the 1970 Bristol 32 and 43.1% for the 1975 Pearson 28, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1970 Bristol 32 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1975 Pearson 28 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 38L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1970 Bristol 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1970 Bristol 32 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1970 Bristol 32 · 1975 Pearson 28