1981 Nautor Swan 36 vs 1975 Pearson 28 — Comparison
1975 Pearson 28
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1981 Nautor Swan 36 | 1975 Pearson 28 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Nautor Swan | Pearson |
| Year | 1981–1989 | 1975–1982 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Finland | USA |
| Designer | Sparkman & Stephens | William Shaw |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.97 m (36.0 ft) | 8.53 m (28.0 ft) |
| LWL | 8.53 m (28.0 ft) | 7.01 m (23.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.35 m (11.0 ft) | 2.74 m (9.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.98 m (6.5 ft) | 1.37 m (4.5 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 6,350 kg (13,999 lbs) | 2,948 kg (6,499 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,722 kg (6,001 lbs) | 1,270 kg (2,800 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 54.5 m² (587 ft²) | 30.0 m² (323 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 28 HP | 10 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 100 L (26.4 gal) | 38 L (10.0 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 180 L (47.6 gal) | 57 L (15.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 5 |
| Cabins | 2 | 1 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 and 1975 Pearson 28 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 is a 1980s design by Nautor Swan from Finland, while the 1975 Pearson 28 is a 1970s offering from Pearson from USA. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 was penned by Sparkman & Stephens. The 1975 Pearson 28 was designed by William Shaw.
In terms of size, the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 1975 Pearson 28 at 8.53m (28.0ft) with a 2.74m beam. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 is 2.44m longer than the 1975 Pearson 28. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 displaces approximately 115% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.15 and 54.5 m² of sail area. The 1975 Pearson 28, with an SA/D of 14.83 and 30.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The 1975 Pearson 28 has a comfort ratio of 21.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 42.9% for the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 and 43.1% for the 1975 Pearson 28, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The 1975 Pearson 28 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 38L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1981 Nautor Swan 36 · 1975 Pearson 28