1970 Bristol 32 vs Hunter 30 — Comparison

1970 Bristol 321970 Bristol 32
VS
Hunter 30Hunter 30

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1970 Bristol 32Hunter 30
General
ManufacturerBristolHunter
Year1970–19771991–1996
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerHalsey HerreshoffHunter Design Team
Dimensions
LOA9.75 m (32.0 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
LWL7.16 m (23.5 ft)7.92 m (26.0 ft)
Beam2.97 m (9.7 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)
Ballast1,905 kg (4,200 lbs)1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area40.2 m² (433 ft²)41.0 m² (441 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1970 Bristol 32
14.91
Hunter 30
16.94
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1970 Bristol 32
42.00
Hunter 30
41.18
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1970 Bristol 32
0.72
Hunter 30
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1970 Bristol 32
25.96
Hunter 30
19.54

Detailed Comparison

The 1970 Bristol 32 and Hunter 30 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1970 Bristol 32 is a 1970s design by Bristol from USA, while the Hunter 30 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1970 Bristol 32 was penned by Halsey Herreshoff. The Hunter 30 was designed by Hunter Design Team.

In terms of size, the 1970 Bristol 32 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.97m, compared to the Hunter 30 at 9.14m (30.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1970 Bristol 32 is 0.61m longer than the Hunter 30. The 1970 Bristol 32 displaces approximately 18% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1970 Bristol 32 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.91 and 40.2 m² of sail area. The Hunter 30, with an SA/D of 16.94 and 41.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hunter 30 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1970 Bristol 32 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 26.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The Hunter 30 has a comfort ratio of 19.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 42.0% for the 1970 Bristol 32 and 41.2% for the Hunter 30, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1970 Bristol 32 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Hunter 30 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1970 Bristol 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 30 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hunter 30 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1970 Bristol 32 · Hunter 30