1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 vs Hunter 30 — Comparison

1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36
VS
Hunter 30Hunter 30

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36Hunter 30
General
ManufacturerHallberg-RassyHunter
Year1989–20001991–1996
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenUSA
DesignerGerman FrersHunter Design Team
Dimensions
LOA10.85 m (35.6 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)7.92 m (26.0 ft)
Beam3.47 m (11.4 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,257 kg (15,999 lbs)3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)
Ballast2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area60.5 m² (651 ft²)41.0 m² (441 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity250 L (66.0 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36
16.40
Hunter 30
16.94
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36
40.62
Hunter 30
41.18
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36
0.72
Hunter 30
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36
22.82
Hunter 30
19.54

Detailed Comparison

The 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 and Hunter 30 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 is a 1980s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the Hunter 30 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 was penned by German Frers. The Hunter 30 was designed by Hunter Design Team.

In terms of size, the 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 measures 10.85m (35.6ft) overall with a beam of 3.47m, compared to the Hunter 30 at 9.14m (30.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 is 1.71m longer than the Hunter 30. The 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 displaces approximately 88% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.40 and 60.5 m² of sail area. The Hunter 30, with an SA/D of 16.94 and 41.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hunter 30 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The Hunter 30 has a comfort ratio of 19.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 40.6% for the 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 and 41.2% for the Hunter 30, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 250L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The Hunter 30 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 30 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 · Hunter 30