Hunter 30 vs Hunter 380 — Comparison
Hunter 30
Hunter 380
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Hunter 30 | Hunter 380 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hunter | Hunter |
| Year | 1991–1996 | 2001–2005 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | Hunter Design Team | Glenn Henderson |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 9.14 m (30.0 ft) | 11.58 m (38.0 ft) |
| LWL | 7.92 m (26.0 ft) | 10.06 m (33.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.05 m (10.0 ft) | 3.76 m (12.3 ft) |
| Draft | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) | 1.83 m (6.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 3,856 kg (8,501 lbs) | 7,257 kg (15,999 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,588 kg (3,501 lbs) | 2,722 kg (6,001 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 41.0 m² (441 ft²) | 64.0 m² (689 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 18 HP | 35 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 57 L (15.1 gal) | 114 L (30.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 114 L (30.1 gal) | 227 L (60.0 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 7 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Hunter 30 and Hunter 380 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 30 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the Hunter 380 is a 2000s offering from Hunter from USA. The Hunter 30 was penned by Hunter Design Team. The Hunter 380 was designed by Glenn Henderson.
In terms of size, the Hunter 30 measures 9.14m (30.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the Hunter 380 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.76m beam. The Hunter 380 is 2.44m longer than the Hunter 30. The Hunter 380 displaces approximately 88% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Hunter 30 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.94 and 41.0 m² of sail area. The Hunter 380, with an SA/D of 17.35 and 64.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 380 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Hunter 30 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The Hunter 380 has a comfort ratio of 17.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 41.2% for the Hunter 30 and 37.5% for the Hunter 380, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Hunter 30 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Hunter 380 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 114L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The Hunter 30 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Hunter 380 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The Hunter 380 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Hunter 30 · Hunter 380