1989 J/35 vs Hunter 380 — Comparison
Hunter 380
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1989 J/35 | Hunter 380 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | J/Boats | Hunter |
| Year | 1989–1993 | 2001–2005 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | Rod Johnstone | Glenn Henderson |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.67 m (35.0 ft) | 11.58 m (38.0 ft) |
| LWL | 9.14 m (30.0 ft) | 10.06 m (33.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.43 m (11.3 ft) | 3.76 m (12.3 ft) |
| Draft | 1.98 m (6.5 ft) | 1.83 m (6.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 5,216 kg (11,499 lbs) | 7,257 kg (15,999 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,268 kg (5,000 lbs) | 2,722 kg (6,001 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 57.6 m² (620 ft²) | 64.0 m² (689 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 18 HP | 35 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 57 L (15.1 gal) | 114 L (30.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 76 L (20.1 gal) | 227 L (60.0 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 7 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1989 J/35 and Hunter 380 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1989 J/35 is a 1980s design by J/Boats from USA, while the Hunter 380 is a 2000s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1989 J/35 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The Hunter 380 was designed by Glenn Henderson.
In terms of size, the 1989 J/35 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.43m, compared to the Hunter 380 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.76m beam. The Hunter 380 is 0.91m longer than the 1989 J/35. The Hunter 380 displaces approximately 39% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1989 J/35 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 19.46 and 57.6 m² of sail area. The Hunter 380, with an SA/D of 17.35 and 64.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1989 J/35 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1989 J/35 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The Hunter 380 has a comfort ratio of 17.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 1989 J/35 and 37.5% for the Hunter 380, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1989 J/35 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Hunter 380 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 114L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The Hunter 380 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1989 J/35 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The Hunter 380 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1989 J/35 · Hunter 380