1970 Bristol 32 vs Hanse 400 — Comparison
1970 Bristol 32
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1970 Bristol 32 | Hanse 400 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Bristol | Hanse |
| Year | 1970–1977 | 2002–2006 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | Germany |
| Designer | Halsey Herreshoff | judel/vrolijk & co |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 9.75 m (32.0 ft) | 12.10 m (39.7 ft) |
| LWL | 7.16 m (23.5 ft) | 10.60 m (34.8 ft) |
| Beam | 2.97 m (9.7 ft) | 3.80 m (12.5 ft) |
| Draft | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) | 1.95 m (6.4 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs) | 7,600 kg (16,755 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,905 kg (4,200 lbs) | 2,350 kg (5,181 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 40.2 m² (433 ft²) | 68.0 m² (732 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Full | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 15 HP | 29 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 57 L (15.1 gal) | 150 L (39.6 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 76 L (20.1 gal) | 280 L (74.0 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 5 | 8 |
| Cabins | 1 | 3 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1970 Bristol 32 and Hanse 400 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1970 Bristol 32 is a 1970s design by Bristol from USA, while the Hanse 400 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1970 Bristol 32 was penned by Halsey Herreshoff. The Hanse 400 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.
In terms of size, the 1970 Bristol 32 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.97m, compared to the Hanse 400 at 12.10m (39.7ft) with a 3.80m beam. The Hanse 400 is 2.35m longer than the 1970 Bristol 32. The Hanse 400 displaces approximately 68% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1970 Bristol 32 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.91 and 40.2 m² of sail area. The Hanse 400, with an SA/D of 17.87 and 68.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hanse 400 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1970 Bristol 32 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 26.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The Hanse 400 has a comfort ratio of 16.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 42.0% for the 1970 Bristol 32 and 30.9% for the Hanse 400, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1970 Bristol 32 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Hanse 400 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 280L water and 150L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1970 Bristol 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Hanse 400 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The Hanse 400 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1970 Bristol 32 · Hanse 400