1970 Bristol 32 vs 2014 Elan 400 — Comparison

1970 Bristol 321970 Bristol 32
VS
2014 Elan 4002014 Elan 400

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1970 Bristol 322014 Elan 400
General
ManufacturerBristolElan
Year1970–19772014–2018
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSASlovenia
DesignerHalsey HerreshoffRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA9.75 m (32.0 ft)12.07 m (39.6 ft)
LWL7.16 m (23.5 ft)10.50 m (34.4 ft)
Beam2.97 m (9.7 ft)3.90 m (12.8 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)8,200 kg (18,078 lbs)
Ballast1,905 kg (4,200 lbs)2,600 kg (5,732 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area40.2 m² (433 ft²)76.0 m² (818 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP30 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths57
Cabins13

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1970 Bristol 32
14.91
2014 Elan 400
18.99
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1970 Bristol 32
42.00
2014 Elan 400
31.71
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1970 Bristol 32
0.72
2014 Elan 400
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1970 Bristol 32
25.96
2014 Elan 400
17.08

Detailed Comparison

The 1970 Bristol 32 and 2014 Elan 400 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1970 Bristol 32 is a 1970s design by Bristol from USA, while the 2014 Elan 400 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 1970 Bristol 32 was penned by Halsey Herreshoff. The 2014 Elan 400 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 1970 Bristol 32 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.97m, compared to the 2014 Elan 400 at 12.07m (39.6ft) with a 3.90m beam. The 2014 Elan 400 is 2.32m longer than the 1970 Bristol 32. The 2014 Elan 400 displaces approximately 81% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1970 Bristol 32 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.91 and 40.2 m² of sail area. The 2014 Elan 400, with an SA/D of 18.99 and 76.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2014 Elan 400 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1970 Bristol 32 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 26.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The 2014 Elan 400 has a comfort ratio of 17.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 42.0% for the 1970 Bristol 32 and 31.7% for the 2014 Elan 400, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1970 Bristol 32 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 2014 Elan 400 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 250L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1970 Bristol 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2014 Elan 400 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2014 Elan 400 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1970 Bristol 32 · 2014 Elan 400