1970 Columbia 26 Mk II vs 1982 Westerly Konsort — Comparison

1970 Columbia 26 Mk II 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II
VS
1982 Westerly Konsort 1982 Westerly Konsort

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II 1982 Westerly Konsort
General
Manufacturer Columbia Westerly
Year 1970–1975 1982–1990
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA UK
Designer William Crealock Ed Dubois
Dimensions
LOA 7.92 m (26.0 ft) 9.50 m (31.2 ft)
LWL 6.25 m (20.5 ft) 7.70 m (25.3 ft)
Beam 2.44 m (8.0 ft) 3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft 1.22 m (4.0 ft) 1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 1,905 kg (4,200 lbs) 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast 726 kg (1,601 lbs) 1,633 kg (3,600 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 26.2 m² (282 ft²) 34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Bilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine 10 HP 15 HP
Fuel Capacity 23 L (6.1 gal) 68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity 38 L (10.0 gal) 114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 6
Cabins 1 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1970 Columbia 26 Mk II
17.33
1982 Westerly Konsort
12.61
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1970 Columbia 26 Mk II
38.11
1982 Westerly Konsort
36.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1970 Columbia 26 Mk II
0.79
1982 Westerly Konsort
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1970 Columbia 26 Mk II
19.58
1982 Westerly Konsort
22.75

Detailed Comparison

The 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II and 1982 Westerly Konsort represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II is a 1970s design by Columbia from USA, while the 1982 Westerly Konsort is a 1980s offering from Westerly from UK. The 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II was penned by William Crealock. The 1982 Westerly Konsort was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II measures 7.92m (26.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.44m, compared to the 1982 Westerly Konsort at 9.50m (31.2ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 1982 Westerly Konsort is 1.58m longer than the 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II. The 1982 Westerly Konsort displaces approximately 138% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.33 and 26.2 m² of sail area. The 1982 Westerly Konsort, with an SA/D of 12.61 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1982 Westerly Konsort has a comfort ratio of 22.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 38.1% for the 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II and 36.0% for the 1982 Westerly Konsort, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 38L of water capacity and 23L of fuel. The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Westerly Konsort is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS