1993 Najad 360 vs 1982 Westerly Konsort — Comparison

1993 Najad 360 1993 Najad 360
VS
1982 Westerly Konsort 1982 Westerly Konsort

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1993 Najad 360 1982 Westerly Konsort
General
Manufacturer Najad Westerly
Year 1993–2002 1982–1990
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Sweden UK
Designer Judel/Vrolijk Ed Dubois
Dimensions
LOA 10.97 m (36.0 ft) 9.50 m (31.2 ft)
LWL 9.14 m (30.0 ft) 7.70 m (25.3 ft)
Beam 3.42 m (11.2 ft) 3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft 1.80 m (5.9 ft) 1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 6,500 kg (14,330 lbs) 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast 2,700 kg (5,952 lbs) 1,633 kg (3,600 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 55.0 m² (592 ft²) 34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Bilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine 28 HP 15 HP
Fuel Capacity 120 L (31.7 gal) 68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity 200 L (52.8 gal) 114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1993 Najad 360
16.04
1982 Westerly Konsort
12.61
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1993 Najad 360
41.54
1982 Westerly Konsort
36.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1993 Najad 360
0.73
1982 Westerly Konsort
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1993 Najad 360
20.68
1982 Westerly Konsort
22.75

Detailed Comparison

The 1993 Najad 360 and 1982 Westerly Konsort represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1993 Najad 360 is a 1990s design by Najad from Sweden, while the 1982 Westerly Konsort is a 1980s offering from Westerly from UK. The 1993 Najad 360 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 1982 Westerly Konsort was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 1993 Najad 360 measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.42m, compared to the 1982 Westerly Konsort at 9.50m (31.2ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 1993 Najad 360 is 1.47m longer than the 1982 Westerly Konsort. The 1993 Najad 360 displaces approximately 43% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1993 Najad 360 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.04 and 55.0 m² of sail area. The 1982 Westerly Konsort, with an SA/D of 12.61 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1993 Najad 360 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1993 Najad 360 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 1982 Westerly Konsort has a comfort ratio of 22.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 41.5% for the 1993 Najad 360 and 36.0% for the 1982 Westerly Konsort, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1993 Najad 360 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 200L of water capacity and 120L of fuel. The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Westerly Konsort is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1993 Najad 360 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS