1972 Contest 31 vs 1984 Moody 33 — Comparison

1972 Contest 311972 Contest 31
VS
1984 Moody 331984 Moody 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1972 Contest 311984 Moody 33
General
ManufacturerContestMoody
Year1972–19821984–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryNetherlandsUK
DesignerDick ZaalBill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA9.45 m (31.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)3.25 m (10.7 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.40 m (4.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)5,200 kg (11,464 lbs)
Ballast1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)2,100 kg (4,630 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area39.5 m² (425 ft²)44.0 m² (474 ft²)
Hull MaterialSteelFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP20 HP
Fuel Capacity80 L (21.1 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)140 L (37.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1972 Contest 31
14.65
1984 Moody 33
14.90
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1972 Contest 31
39.99
1984 Moody 33
40.38
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1972 Contest 31
0.74
1984 Moody 33
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1972 Contest 31
23.65
1984 Moody 33
21.57

Detailed Comparison

The 1972 Contest 31 and 1984 Moody 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1972 Contest 31 is a 1970s design by Contest from Netherlands, while the 1984 Moody 33 is a 1980s offering from Moody from UK. The 1972 Contest 31 was penned by Dick Zaal. The 1984 Moody 33 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the 1972 Contest 31 measures 9.45m (31.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 1984 Moody 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.25m beam. The 1984 Moody 33 is 0.61m longer than the 1972 Contest 31. The 1984 Moody 33 displaces approximately 15% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1972 Contest 31 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.65 and 39.5 m² of sail area. The 1984 Moody 33, with an SA/D of 14.90 and 44.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1984 Moody 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1972 Contest 31 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1984 Moody 33 has a comfort ratio of 21.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1972 Contest 31 and 40.4% for the 1984 Moody 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1972 Contest 31 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 150L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 1984 Moody 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 140L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1972 Contest 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1984 Moody 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1984 Moody 33 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1972 Contest 31 · 1984 Moody 33