1972 Irwin 37 vs 1981 Pearson 424 — Comparison

1972 Irwin 37 1972 Irwin 37
VS
1981 Pearson 424 1981 Pearson 424

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1972 Irwin 37 1981 Pearson 424
General
Manufacturer Irwin Pearson
Year 1972–1978 1981–1985
Type Ketch Ketch
Country USA USA
Designer Ted Irwin William Shaw
Dimensions
LOA 11.28 m (37.0 ft) 12.80 m (42.0 ft)
LWL 8.84 m (29.0 ft) 10.36 m (34.0 ft)
Beam 3.40 m (11.2 ft) 3.81 m (12.5 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 7,484 kg (16,499 lbs) 9,525 kg (20,999 lbs)
Ballast 2,948 kg (6,499 lbs) 3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 57.6 m² (620 ft²) 72.0 m² (775 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Full Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 25 HP 50 HP
Fuel Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 151 L (39.9 gal)
Water Capacity 189 L (49.9 gal) 340 L (89.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 7
Cabins 2 3

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1972 Irwin 37
15.29
1981 Pearson 424
16.28
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1972 Irwin 37
39.39
1981 Pearson 424
38.10
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1972 Irwin 37
0.70
1981 Pearson 424
0.72
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1972 Irwin 37
24.59
1981 Pearson 424
20.02

Detailed Comparison

The 1972 Irwin 37 and 1981 Pearson 424 represent two takes on ketch-rigged sailing. The 1972 Irwin 37 is a 1970s design by Irwin from USA, while the 1981 Pearson 424 is a 1980s offering from Pearson from USA. The 1972 Irwin 37 was penned by Ted Irwin. The 1981 Pearson 424 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 1972 Irwin 37 measures 11.28m (37.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the 1981 Pearson 424 at 12.80m (42.0ft) with a 3.81m beam. The 1981 Pearson 424 is 1.52m longer than the 1972 Irwin 37. The 1981 Pearson 424 displaces approximately 27% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1972 Irwin 37 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.29 and 57.6 m² of sail area. The 1981 Pearson 424, with an SA/D of 16.28 and 72.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1981 Pearson 424 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1972 Irwin 37 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 24.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.70). The 1981 Pearson 424 has a comfort ratio of 20.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 39.4% for the 1972 Irwin 37 and 38.1% for the 1981 Pearson 424, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1972 Irwin 37 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 1981 Pearson 424 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 340L water and 151L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1972 Irwin 37 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1981 Pearson 424 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS